Prediction of Jacob Bradshaw [674th] vs Ray Ho [893rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W L L L
Form
W L L L W L L L L LH2H: Bradshaw 1 - 0 Ho
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bradshaw winning 2 and Ho winning 0. The last match between Bradshaw and Ho was at the Jinan Challenger, 18-08-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Jacob Bradshaw getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jacob Bradshaw | 1 |
| Ray Ho | 0 |
| Bradshaw | Stats | Ho |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (3-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 17% (1-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 674 | Ranking | 893 |
| 479 | Highest Rank | 715 |
| 22 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (128-92) | Career Total W/L | 50% (136-134) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Ray Ho
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:23:21 | Average Match Time | 1:23:21 |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve % | 52% (29/56) |
| 75% (24/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (18/29) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (9/27) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 52% (29/56) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jacob Bradshaw vs Ray Ho Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bradshaw 1 - 0 Ho
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bradshaw has won 49.09% of points on their second serve, while Ho has won 49.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bradshaw, in recent form, has won 44.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ho has won 46.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.27% and 20.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bradshaw has saved 62.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ho has saved 64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bradshaw has won 51.11% of matches played (W/L 23/ 22), with Ho winning 18.18% (W/L 4/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bradshaw has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 124/ 84), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Bradshaw has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.13% of matches (W/L 17/ 15), where as Ho has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 3/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bradshaw winning 1 times and Ho being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bradshaw winning 2 and Ho winning 0. The last match between Bradshaw and Ho was at the Jinan Challenger, 18-08-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Jacob Bradshaw getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bradshaw and Ho have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bradshaw winning 0 times and Ho 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bradshaw winning 0, and Ho 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bradshaw has played against opponents with an average rank of 54.38 while Ho has played against players with an average rank of 125.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bradshaw has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ho has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bradshaw has converted 18.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ho has converted 23.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jacob Bradshaw vs Ray Ho Best Odds For The Match
Jacob Bradshaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Faut
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
97%
(
29 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
James Watt
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
70 of
97)
3
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Cruz Hewitt
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Quentin Halys
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
50
Total Points Won
46
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
72%
(
21 of
29)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
5 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Ray Ho Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Ray Ho
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
3
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Ray Ho
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Ray Ho
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
5
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Ray Ho
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ray Ho
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Saba Purtseladze
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
21 of
25)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Ray Ho
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Ray Ho
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
0
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Ray Ho
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Bradshaw vs Ho?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Bradshaw Vs Ho is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (128/92) | Win/Loss | 50% (136/134) |
| 57% (281/209) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (296/300) |
| 53% (2478/2209) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2904/2688) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.41 |
| 712 | Aces Total | 1120 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 397 | Total Double Faults | 416 |
| 1:23:1 | Average Match Time | 1:18:41 |
| 94.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 194.56 |
| 63% (7201/11394) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9033/14472) |
| 69% (4964/7201) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (6314/9033) |
| 52% (2178/4193) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2782/5439) |
| 41% (413/1018) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (508/1305) |
| 38% (4372/11469) | Return Points Win % | 37% (5404/14490) |
| 60% (125/210) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (130/263) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 61% (42/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 34% (23/67) |
| 53% (29/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (31/61) |
| 88% (127/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (138/119) |
| 12% (127/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (138/18) |
| 16% (92/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (132/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
